Kui Li,Jiawen Wang,Shengxiong Liu,Sen Su,Chenjian Feng,Xiaoxiang Fan,Zhiyong Yin.[J].Chin J Traumatol,2015,18(2):65-73. [doi]
Biomechanical behavior of brain injury caused by sticks using finite element model and Hybrid-III testing
  
DOI:
KeyWord: Biomechanics  Head injury  Sticks  Hybrid-III  THUMS  FEM
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliation
Kui Li Research Institute of Surgery/Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, 
Jiawen Wang Department of Basic Medical Institute of Pathology, Foshan University 
Shengxiong Liu School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Chongqing University of Technology 
Sen Su Research Institute of Surgery/Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, 
Chenjian Feng Research Institute of Surgery/Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, 
Xiaoxiang Fan School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Chongqing University of Technology 
Zhiyong Yin Research Institute of Surgery/Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, 
Hits:
Download times:
Abstract:
      Objective: To study the biomechanical mechanism of head injuries beaten with sticks, which is common in the battery or assaultive cases. Methods: In this study, the Hybrid-III anthropomorphic test device and finite element model (FEM) of the total human model for safety (THUMS) head were used to determine the biomechanical response of head while being beaten with different sticks. Total eight Hybrid-III tests and four finite element simulations were conducted. The contact force, resultant acceleration of head center of gravity, intracranial pressure and von Mises stress were calculated to determine the different biomechanical behavior of head with beaten by different sticks. Results: In Hybrid-III tests, the stick in each group demonstrated the similar kinematic behavior under the same loading condition. The peak values of the resultant acceleration for thick iron stick group, thin iron stick group, thick wooden stick group and thin wooden stick group were 203.4 g, 221.1 g, 170.5 g and 122.2 g respectively. In finite element simulations, positive intracranial pressure was initially observed in the frontal comparing with negative intracranial pressure in the contra-coup site. Subsequently the intracranial pressure in the coup site was decreasing toward negative value while the contra-coup intracranial pressure increasing toward positive values. Conclusions: The results illustrated that the stiffer and larger the stick was, the higher the von Mises stress, contact force and intracranial pressure were. We believed that the results in the Hybrid-III tests and THUMS head simulations for brain injury beaten with sticks could be reliable and useful for better understanding the injury mechanism.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close